Maintenance and reliability professionals track many key performance indicators (KPI’s) to measure the success of their efforts. These indicators can be overwhelming, but are necessary to confirm proper direction and achievement of desired results.
It is important that your CMMS (computerized maintenance management system) has the ability to categorize work orders. Condition monitoring work orders should be categorized by main types and by sub-types (vibration, lubrication, thermography, ultrasonic, electrical, etc.) upon creation within the CMMS.
Your CM and Reliability team should actively track condition monitoring work orders by total created, their type (vibration, lubrication, etc.), status (in process, scheduled, completed, etc.), average length of time to completion, by rejection results, and so on.
These indicators will allow you to ensure that a healthy amount of CM work is available and that this work is given priority, being properly planned, scheduled and executed. It does no good to detect and report a conditional change in equipment only to have it ignored, not properly repaired and then result in a functional failure.
Additionally, technology alarm status can be compared to open corrective work orders in your CMMS. For example, a corrective work order should exist addressing each severe alarm condition (red) reported by a CM technology. If a corresponding work order has not been created, then you should ask “Why”? Is it due to a bad technology alarm? Did the CM analyst miss something or fail to report the condition or repair? Or did the planner or scheduler simply overlook or ignore it?
Monitoring these indicators can help ensure that your CM program is providing continual results that will move your reliability efforts forward.
What indicators do you track to determine success with condition monitoring efforts within your company?